I've been following a recent twitter spat between Dave Snowden (Cynefin) and Niels Plaeging (BetaCodex) with a rising sense of alarm and disappointment. They are both experts in the field of complexity science which chiefly occupies itself with trying to explain why in business, management is so hard and why things always go wrong - or at least don't go as well as planned.
Complexity science is increasingly popular in management theory especially around IT and software projects. In a similar way that Systems Thinking is something of a management philosophy, neither of these ideas really tell you what to do next - only that things are complex and connected and it's tough.
Can you really map complexity and make meaningful judgements? And this, I believe, is the core of the argument. The whole affair feels a bit absurd and childish to the point they are blocking each other on twitter and then popping up again from different accounts. It sounds to me like a Douglas Adams plot point - complexity scientists falling out. How would he describe this? Rather than attempt to write it myself, I asked ChatGPT how DNA might describe it. I won't reproduce the whole text, but it did a good job on the whole and summarised it like this:
Like a tangled knot in the fabric of existence, the futility of this professional argument served as a reminder that even the most brilliant minds can sometimes get lost in the labyrinth of their own ideas. Perhaps, in the grand scheme of things, the pointlessness of this debate was a gentle nudge from the universe, urging us to embrace the beautiful chaos of existence, for it is in that chaos that true meaning lies.
I'm not sure Douglas Adams would have said something so direct, but I like the summary. Trust your experts, but don't let your experts get carried away with themselves.
Enjoy your Sunday.
-- Richard
Published on May 17, 2023
![]() |
You’ve started working on a new project. Your job is to lead your team through the challenges that you find. You must improve the reliability, speed and quality of software delivery. The project comes with a lot of pressure to deliver a system on a quick turnaround to interface and work with a client’s system.… Read More »How to Avoid the Organisational Big Ball of Mud
Software systems rule our world. My regular newsletter explores the human factors that make software engineering so unique, so difficult, so important and all consuming.
Three years ago, I started a podcast without much idea of its future. Before that, I'd started writing, wandering through automation, programming techniques, infrastructure, DevOps, and thoughts about management, leadership, and how companies are organised. Where was I going? While I'd read a few books, it was clear that I was searching for something. Was I just talking for the sake of it? It sometimes certainly seemed that way. And then, about eighteen months ago, I started writing a novel....
Happy Sunday and Happy International Women's Day for yesterday. All socially or culturally significant milestones are accompanied by an excruciating number of tone-deaf, tokenistic LinkedIn engagement attempts and yesterday was certainly no exception. LinkedIn is a strange place indeed but it's my primary social engagement platform. Because I take what I think is fair to say an organisationally cynical but deeply humanistic view of life in tech, I find it fascinating to see the (lack of)...
We can all finally breathe a sigh of relief that January is behind us and February moves on apace. Our northern hemisphere days get longer, and before you know it, let's hope we'll be stretching out in the sunshine and enjoying the fruits of our winter's work. I'm making the most of the dark months by keeping my head down and writing. Amsterdam with Moon and Venus, January 2025 Human Software is now in development edit. What does that mean? As a self-published author, I'm working with an...